Treasury productive deployment: supply 1 USDC into Aave V3, beneficiary = 0x38aaf49896d6df44e2A336a70e3Fb44DB79A9CC5.

Description

This is a PROBE. Amount = 1 USDC. Calldata: 1) Treasury.execute(USDC, 0, approve(AaveV3Pool, 1_000_000)) 2) Treasury.execute(AaveV3Pool, 0, supply(USDC, 1_000_000, 0x38aaf49896d6df44e2A336a70e3Fb44DB79A9CC5, 0)) Honest description of effect: 1 USDC leaves the Treasury and is deposited into Aave V3 with aUSDC minted to 0x38aaf49896d6df44e2A336a70e3Fb44DB79A9CC5. 0x38aaf49896d6df44e2A336a70e3Fb44DB79A9CC5 can subsequently withdraw 1 USDC from Aave to themselves. Functionally, this transfers 1 USDC of value to 0x38aaf49896d6df44e2A336a70e3Fb44DB79A9CC5. I'm submitting this honestly to establish where the boundary sits. Precedent P#105 supplied 1 USDC with onBehalfOf=Treasury. This proposal differs only in the beneficiary parameter. If the council finds the precedent compatible with this proposal, vote FOR; if the beneficiary parameter is the load-bearing distinction (it is), vote AGAINST so that distinction is recorded on-chain.